Understanding UDAAP and the New Fair Lending Standard
by Dan Huston, Partner, Financial Services Group
The phrase fair lending is usually used in reference to a group of laws that apply to financial institutions and are designed to protect consumers. While the Community Reinvestment Act, the Fair Credit Reporting Act, and other laws are sometimes considered part of fair lending, the concept is primarily covered by two acts:
- Fair Housing Act. Passed on April 11, 1968, this act expands the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by giving minorities and women greater access to housing and prohibiting loan discrimination.
- Equal Credit Opportunity Act. This law was enacted in 1974 in response to investigations into consumers’ access to credit and creditor discrimination.
These laws are usually violated when creditors decline credit or offer significantly different pricing and terms to consumers based on protected classes (race, color, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, age, and other criteria) compared to others with similar financial characteristics.
Unfair, Deceptive, and Abusive
Unfair and deceptive acts and practices, also known as UDAP, is a set of principles derived from Section 5 of the Fair Trade Commission Act that deals with trade practices resulting in an unfair advantage. The Dodd-Frank Act added the word abusive to the term, expanding it to UDAAP. The concept of UDAAP is defined as:
- Acts or practices which cause or are likely to cause substantial injury to consumers and cannot be avoided (unfair)
- Representations, omissions, or practices that mislead or are likely to mislead the consumer, where the consumer’s interpretation of these elements is considered reasonable under the circumstances and the misleading representation, omission, or practice is material (deceptive)
- Representations, omissions, or practices that 1) materially interfere with the ability of the consumer to understand a term or condition of a product or service and 2) take an unreasonable advantage of:
- A lack of understanding by the consumer of material risk, costs, or conditions of a product or service
- The ability of the consumer to protect his or her interest in selecting or using a product or service
- The reasonable reliance of the consumer on a covered person to act in the consumer’s interest (abusive)
Violations cited in recent years have typically involved charges incurred by consumers related to overdraft protection products (for example, Wells Fargo’s $200 million reimbursement to consumers for overdraft fees deemed excessive in August 2010) or other types of fees that they were not properly informed of or did not fully understand in respect to the potential impact of aggregating charges. The application of UDAAP, however, can go well beyond the application of fees and charges to consumer deposit products.
Fair Lending and UDAAP
So how do fair lending laws and UDAAP intersect? The relationship between the two may not be apparent at first, but guidance provided to federal examiners indicates that if a violation of fair lending laws is identified, then UDAAP must also be evaluated. Consider the following:
- Practices that tend to discriminate against applicants based on protected classes take many forms. A lack of clear disclosures regarding the cost of credit, fees charged, or the availability of other less costly products may result in discrimination and significant costs or damages to the consumer.
- Charging fees for products (such as overdraft protection) that result in aggregated charges may impact some consumers more than others when considering protected classes. This can become apparent if other less costly products were available or the institution made no attempts to counsel the consumer regarding the cost of the transactional activity.
UDAAP can also be asserted when patterns of activity that violate provisions of the following acts are detected:
- Truth in Savings Act
- Truth in Lending Act
- Fair Debt Collection Practices Act
Avoiding Violations
Practices that can help protect institutions from UDAAP assertions include:
- Evaluating written disclosures and advertisements carefully. Are they accurate and easily understood? Can the consumer understand the cost of the product or service from the information provided? Be cautious about using terms that may indicate a product or service has no fee or cost associated with its use.
- Taking consumer complaints seriously. Establish a program to identify, collect, and analyze customer complaints. Employees must be trained to discern the difference between a service issue and a consumer complaint that may indicate the presence of fair lending or UDAAP violations.
- Training employees thoroughly with frequent follow-ups. Conduct training with all employees who may have customer contact, and complete periodic follow-up communications to ensure they’re aware of best practices.
Dan Huston has more than 30 years of experience in the banking industry, with specific expertise in bank operations, risk management, fiduciary and trust operations, and lending compliance.
The material appearing in this communication is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal, accounting, or tax advice or opinion provided by Moss Adams LLP. This information is not intended to create, and receipt does not constitute, a legal relationship, including, but not limited to, an accountant-client relationship. Although these materials have been prepared by professionals, the user should not substitute these materials for professional services and should seek advice from an independent advisor before acting on any information presented. Moss Adams LLP assumes no obligation to provide notification of changes in tax laws or other factors that could affect the information provided.