If your employees are working from another country—even temporarily—your organization should evaluate the tax implications of a cross-border work arrangement to protect itself from cross-border tax complications.
In recent years, there has been a significant increase in remote work arrangements. Many employers have found themselves with employees working remotely across an international border. During the pandemic many countries offered temporary tax relief to this type of employment. However, as remote international work becomes more common, countries have varied their treatment of the tax implications.
Below, you can learn how to navigate the tax implications of cross-border work arrangements.
When an employee works across an international border, an employer should consider whether the employee’s activities in that country causes the organization to have a permanent establishment—and therefore taxable presence—in the country where the employee performs their work. Most countries source income to the location where services were performed.
A permanent establishment typically subjects the company to income tax in that country based on the following:
A common tax question is whether a company has employees, contractors, or consultants.
This is a significant distinction because, as noted above, having employees in countries apart from the location of the employer can establish a taxable presence for the employer in that location.
Some countries view contractors as employees, which may inadvertently create a tax presence for the company in those foreign jurisdictions.
Here’s what you can do:
It’s important to obtain a complete understanding of how all cross-border employees are compensated and what duties they perform. A framework looks at job duties for personnel abroad and helps align them with how the activities are viewed locally. Specifically, a framework limits the functions for employees or contractors. It can be the difference between creating a taxable presence for the company or not.
Remember that the definition of an employee, contractor, or consultant in the United States may differ from those in the country where the person is working remotely.
If the United States has a treaty with a country where the organization has employees, income tax issues may be covered.
However, treaties don’t necessarily cover local employment law issues, and there’s always the possibility of a new foreign government assuming power and changing the law.
To mitigate complications, research local country law and continue to assess these laws periodically because they may change.
To manage global payroll risk, some companies use professional employment organizations (PEOs) or administrative services organizations (ASOs) to handle the daily administration as well as payroll tax and returns for team members working abroad.
Outsourcing can reduce risk because employees are contracted with the PEO rather than the company. However, outsourcing doesn’t necessarily prevent a contracted employee from creating an international tax presence for a company.
A withholding tax represents an obligation on behalf of the payer of an item of income to withhold tax from a payment made to a nonresident recipient.
After that, the payer is required to remit this amount to the taxing authority on behalf of the nonresident recipient.
Withholding tax is used to ensure a tax payment is collected on specifically identified items of income paid to nonresident recipients. These include payments for management fees and technical services and activities typically performed by employees or contractors.
Most countries have a domestic or standard rate of withholding tax established for payment of income to nonresident recipients. The domestic and standard rates of withholding tax vary by jurisdiction and often may be reduced or eliminated under an applicable income tax treaty between the payer and recipient home countries.
A growing number of countries have regulations requiring transfer pricing. Tax authorities around the world have intensified their focus on the issue.
Transfer pricing may be implicated in a cross-border remote work arrangement if the employee’s activities benefit more than one company within a controlled group. If your organization implements an offshore employee holding company, transfer pricing is implicated.
To be respected by tax authorities, transactions between related parties may require the following:
US companies with employees working abroad should consider US tax reporting obligations arising from the activities performed by its employees outside the United States.
Depending on the US tax classification of your organization’s overseas business activities, various information returns may need to be filed with the organization’s US income tax return. Noncompliance with the information return filing requirements carries at least a $10,000 penalty for each missed filing and may result in the statute of limitations for your US income tax return remaining open indefinitely.
Since 2018, the IRS has established additional filing requirements for Form 8858, Information Return of US Persons with Respect to Foreign Disregarded Entities (FDEs) and Foreign Branches (FBs).
These filing requirements rely on a facts and circumstances analysis of an organization’s cross-border activities to determine whether a Form 8858 should be filed. Depending on the nature of an employee’s activities and level of authority, a remote work arrangement could establish the basis for a Form 8858 filing requirement for your organization.
Each country has their own requirements for compliance with labor rules, including income tax withholding on employment income and programs like US Social Security and Medicare. Compliance can further vary depending on the locality within that country. Additionally, there may be compliance requirements on both the company and the employee. It’s important to connect with a competent advisor in the country where an employee is working to ensure compliance with all the local rules.
If you have questions about the impacts of your employees working overseas remotely, please contact your firm professional.
Baker Tilly US, LLP, Baker Tilly Advisory Group, LP and Moss Adams LLP and their affiliated entities operate under an alternative practice structure in accordance with the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct and applicable laws, regulations and professional standards. Baker Tilly Advisory Group, LP and its subsidiaries, and Baker Tilly US, LLP and its affiliated entities, trading as Baker Tilly, are members of the global network of Baker Tilly International Ltd., the members of which are separate and independent legal entities. Baker Tilly US, LLP and Moss Adams LLP are licensed CPA firms that provide assurance services to their clients. Baker Tilly Advisory Group, LP and its subsidiary entities provide tax and consulting services to their clients and are not licensed CPA firms. ISO certification services offered through Moss Adams Certifications LLC. Investment advisory offered through either Moss Adams Wealth Advisors LLC or Baker Tilly Wealth Management, LLC.