Alert

Washington Supreme Court Decision Clarifies Laws on Premiums Tax

LinkedIn Share Button Twitter Share Button Other Share Button Other Share Button

The Washington Supreme Court ruled on Envolve Pharmacy Solutions, Inc. v. Department of Revenue on December 12, 2024. This decision impacts insurance providers by clarifying that if an insurance provider pays Washington’s premiums tax, amounts received by a related entity that are derived from insurance premiums are exempt from business and occupation (B&O) tax. Additionally, the related entity must provide administrative services that are functionally related to the insurance provider’s insurance business.

Learn more about the court case below.

The Case

Envolve Pharmacy Solutions (Envolve) provided administrative services for Coordinated Care, a related entity through common ownership. These administrative services included:

  • Maintaining a network of providers of health services
  • Processing claims of providers
  • Reimbursing health care providers for claims
  • Maintaining a drug utilization review program

Coordinated Care paid Washington premiums tax on premiums it received from its health insurance customers, and then out of those receipts, paid amounts to Envolve in exchange for administrative services.

Flow of Service

Flow of service between the contracting entity, service provider, and health insurance customers

Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 82.04.320 provides an exemption from B&O tax for “any person in respect to insurance business upon which a tax based on gross premiums is paid to the state.”

Ruling

The Court found that the phrase “any person in respect to insurance business” in the statute means an entity must perform activities that relate to insurance business to qualify for the exemption, and that Envolve fits into that category despite Envolve not directly paying the premiums tax.

The Court found that functionally related means “incidental to accomplishing the insurance function,” and that the test focuses on the following criteria:

  • The relationship between the contracting entities
  • The character of the service or activity performed
  • Whether the activity is independently entrepreneurial

Next Steps

We recommend a careful review of agreements to confirm the potential impact of Envolve and whether the B&O tax exemption found in RCW 82.04.320 applies to some or all of the intercompany receipts between an insurance provider and its related administrative services entity.

We’re Here to Help

To learn more about the ruling and potential impacts on your business, contact your Moss Adams professional.

Additional Resources

Related Topics

Contact Us with Questions

Baker Tilly US, LLP, Baker Tilly Advisory Group, LP and Moss Adams LLP and their affiliated entities operate under an alternative practice structure in accordance with the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct and applicable laws, regulations and professional standards. Baker Tilly Advisory Group, LP and its subsidiaries, and Baker Tilly US, LLP and its affiliated entities, trading as Baker Tilly, are members of the global network of Baker Tilly International Ltd., the members of which are separate and independent legal entities. Baker Tilly US, LLP and Moss Adams LLP are licensed CPA firms that provide assurance services to their clients. Baker Tilly Advisory Group, LP and its subsidiary entities provide tax and consulting services to their clients and are not licensed CPA firms. ISO certification services offered through Moss Adams Certifications LLC. Investment advisory offered through either Moss Adams Wealth Advisors LLC or Baker Tilly Wealth Management, LLC.